Internet Engineering Task Force Eva Weilandt INTERNET DRAFT Neeraj Khanchandani Fahir Ergincan Sanjay Rao Nortel Networks Expires in six months February 2001 V5.2-User Adaption Layer (V5UA) Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. Abstract This document defines a mechanism for backhauling of V5.2 messages over IP using the Stream control Transmission Protocol (SCTP). This protocol would be used between a Signaling Gateway (SG) and a Media Gateway controller (MGC). It is assumed that the SG receives V5.2 sig- naling over a standard V5.2 interface. This document aims to build on top of the ISDN User Adaptation Layer Protocol (). It defines all differences to the IUAP needed for the V5.2 implementation. Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 1] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................. 3 1.1. Scope .................................................... 3 1.2. Terminology .............................................. 3 1.3. V5.2 Overview ............................................ 5 1.4. Addition to boundary primitives .......................... 7 1.4.1. V5 specific boundary primitives ...................... 7 2. SCTP Stream Management ....................................... 8 3. Proposed V5.2 Backhaul Architecture .......................... 8 3.1. V5UA Message Header ...................................... 9 3.2. V5 Naming Conventions for Interface Identifier ........... 10 3.3. V5 Additions to IUA Boundary Primitives .................. 11 3.4. Link Status Messages ..................................... 12 3.5. Sa-Bit Messages .......................................... 13 4. Examples ..................................................... 14 4.1. Link Identification Procedure (successful) ............... 14 5. IANA Considerations .......................................... 15 5.1. SCTP Payload Protocol Identifier ......................... 16 6. Acknowledgements ............................................. 16 7. References ................................................... 16 8. Author's Addresses ........................................... 17 Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 2] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 1. Introduction This document describes a method of implementing V5.2 backhaul messag- ing over IP using a modified version of the ISDN User Adapation Layer Protocol (IUAP) [1]. The V5UA builds on top of IUA defining the ne- cessary extensions to IUA for a V5.2 implementation. 1.1. Scope There is a need for Switched Circuit Network (SCN) signaling protocol delivery from a V5.2 Signaling Gateway (SG) to a Media Gateway con- troller (MGC) analog to the implementation of the ISDN Q.921 User Adaption Layer (IUA) as described in [1]. This draft supports analog telephone access, ISDN basic rate access and ISDN Primary rate access over a V5.2 interface. Since the V5.2 Layer 2 and specifically Layer 3 differs from the Q.921 and Q.931 Adaption layer, the IUA standard needs to be extended to fulfil the needs for supporting V5.2. 1.2. Terminology Bearer Channel Connection (BCC) protocol - A protocol which allows the Local Exchange (LE) to instruct the Access Network (AN) to allo- cate bearer channels, either singly or in multiples, on demand. Communication channel (C-channel) - A 64 kbit/s time slot on a V5.2 interface provisioned to carry communication paths. Communication path (C-path) - Any one of the following information types: - The layer 2 data link carrying the Control protocol - The layer 2 data link carrying the Link Control protocol - The layer 2 data link carrying the PSTN signalling - Each of the layer 2 data links carrying the protection protocol - The layer 2 data link carrying the BCC protocol - All the ISDN Ds-type data from one or more user ports - All the ISDN p-type data from one or more user ports - All the ISDN t-type data from one or more user ports Note: This definition includes the possibility that there is more Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 3] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 than one C-path of the same information type, each allocated to a different logical C-channel. Envelope Function Address (EFA) - 13 bit number, ranging from 0 to 8191 (decimal). An EFA uniquely identifies one of the five V5.2 protocols, or an ISDN agent attached to an AN. The following list contains the possible values for the EFA: Definition Value ---------- ------ ISDN_PROTOCOL 0 - 8175 PSTN_PROTOCOL 8176 CC_PROTOCOL 8177 BCC_PROTOCOL 8178 PROT_PROTOCOL 8179 LINK_CONTROL_PROTOCOL 8180 RESERVED 8181 - 8191 Logical Communication channel (Logical C-channel) - A group of one or more C-paths, all of different types, but excluding the C-path for the protection protocol. Multi-link - A collection of more than one 2048 kbit/s link which together make up a V5.2 interface. Multi-Slot - A group of more than one 64kbit/s channels providing 8Khz and time slot sequence integrity, generally used together within an ISDN Primary Rate Access (ISDN-PRA) user port, in order to supply a higher bit-rate service. Physical Communication Channel (Physical C-channel) - A 64kbit/s time slot on a V5.2 interface which has been assigned for carrying logical C-channels. A physical C-channel may not be used for car- rying bearer channels. Primary Link - A 2048 kbit/s link in a multi-link V5.2 interface whose physical C-channel in time slot 16 carries a C-path for the pro- tection protocol and, on V5.2 initialization, also the C-path for the control protocol, link control protocol, and the BCC proto- col. Other C-paths may also be carried in the time slot 16. Secondary Link - A 2048 kbit/s link in a multi-link V5.2 interface whose time slot 16 carries a C-path for the protection protocol, and, on V5.2 initialization, acts as the standby C-channel for the control protocol, link control protocol, and BCC protocol and any other C-paths initially carried in time slot 16 of the Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 4] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 primary link. Layer 1 Functional State Machine (L1 FSM) - Functional State Machine in V5 System Management that tracks and controls the states of the physical E1 links on the interface. 1.3. V5.2 Overview V5.2 is an industry standard ETSI interface (reference ETS 300 347-1) defined between a Local Exchange (LE) and an Access Network (AN) pro- viding access to the following types: - Analog telephone access - ISDN Basic rate access - ISDN Primary Rate access (V5.2) - Other analog or digital accesses for semi-permanent connections without associated outband signaling information The original V5 specification (V5.1) uses 2048 kbps links in a non-concentrating fashion. V5.2 may use up to 16 such interface links and supports concentration. ---------- ---------- o--o | | E1 | |------- / | |--------------| | -- | LE | E1 | AN | | |--------------| | o--o | | | |------- / ---------- ---------- -- The LE and AN are connected with up to 16 E1 (PCM30) links. Channels 16, 15 and 31 on any E1 link can be reserved for data communication between LE and AN. The channels reserved for data are called "Communi- cation Channels" or "C-Channels." The C-Channels are the physical media to exchange data between the V5.2 protocol peer entities, as well as to transfer the ISDN BRI D-Ch messages between the terminals and the LE. A logical communication path between two peer entities for one protocol is called a "C-path". The signaling information in V5.2 are defined as: - Analog signals are carried by means of the V5 PSTN protocol (L3) Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 5] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 - ISDN/analog ports are controlled by the V5 Control protocol (L3) - ISDN protocol messages are mapped to LAPD frames, which are carried by means of LAPV5-EF sublayer (L2) - V5 protocol messages are mapped to LAPV5-DL frames, which are carried by means of LAPV5-EF sublayer (L2) In order to support more traffic and dynamic allocation of bearer channels, the V5.2 protocol has several additions: - A bearer channel connection protocol establishes and de- establishes bearer connections required on demand, identified by the signalling information, under the control of the Local Exchange. - A link control protocol is defined for the multi-link manage- ment to control link identification, link blocking and link failure conditions. - A protection protocol, operated on two separate data links for security reasons, is defined to manage the protection switching of communication channels in case of link failures. The following protocols are defined for the various protocol layers: Layer 2: - LAPV5-EF - LAPV5-DL Layer 3: - V5-Link Control - V5-BCC - V5-PSTN - V5-Control - V5-Protection MGC SG +------------+ +-------+-------+ | Lnk Cntrl | | | | +------------+ | | | | Cntrl | | | | +------------+ V5UA | | | V5 +------+ | BCC | <--------> | LAPV5 | LAPV5 | <----> | AN | +------------+ | -DL | -EF | +------+ | PSTN | | | | +------------+ | | | | Protection | | | | +------------+ +-------+-------+ Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 6] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 1.4. Addition to boundary primitives 1.4.1. V5 specific boundary primitives Extending IUAP to support V5.2 requires the introduction of new boun- dary primitives for the Q.921/Q.931 boundary in accordance with the definitions in V5.2. V5.2 reuses just one primitive from the Q.921/Q.931 boundary: the DL- DATA primitive. The responsibility to establish and release data links is shifted to V5 system management. Therefore the DL-Establish and DL-Release primitives are replaced by new primitives between system management and the data link layer [2]: MDL-ESTABLISH The MDL-Establish primitives are used to request, indicate and confirm the outcome of the procedures for establishing multiple frame opera- tion. MDL-RELEASE The MDL-Release primitive is used to indicate the outcome of the pro- cedures for terminating multiple frame operation. In contrary to ISDN, the V5 standards demand that V5.2 system manage- ment interacts directly with V5.2 layer 1. Since V5.2 Layer 1 (includ- ing the L1 FSM) and parts of V5 system management may be physically separated in a V5 backhaul scenario, V5UA needs to support some ser- vice for the communication between these two entities. Specifically these services include an indication of the status of a link, and mes- sages to support link identification procedure. The new messages are defined as shown below: MPH-LINK STATUS START REPORTING The MPH-LINK STATUS START REPORTING message is used by V5 system management to request to start reporting the status of a V5 link from L1 FSM on the SG. MPH-LINK STATUS STOP REPORTING The MPH-LINK STATUS STOP REPORTING message is used by V5 system management to request to stop reporting the status of a V5 link from L1 FSM on the SG. MPH-LINK STATUS INDICATION The MPH-LINK STATUS INDICATION message is used by L1 FSM on the Sig- nalling Gateway to report the status (operational/non-operational) of a V5 link to V5 system management. Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 7] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 MPH-SA-BIT SET The MPH-SA-BIT SET message is used by system management to request that the L1 FSM in the SG sets or resets the value of a specified Sa bit on the requested link. For V5 this message will be used for the Link Identification procedure to set or reset the value of the Sa7 bit. This would be equivalent to the MPH-ID and MPH-NOR primitves in V5.2. MPH-SA-BIT SET ACK The MPH-SA-BIT SET ACK message is used by L1 FSM in the SG to indicate to system management in response to a MPH-SA-BIT-SET message. The mes- sage indicates that the setting of the Sa bit has been performed suc- cessfully. MPH-SA-BIT STATUS The MPH-SA-BIT STATUS messages are used between system management in the MGC and L1 FSM in the SG to request reporting of the status of a specified Sa bit on the requested link, or to report the status of this bit back to system management. For V5 these messages will be used for the Link identification procedure to request or report the status of the Sa7 bit. This would be equivalent to the MPH-IDR, MPH- IDI or MPH-Elg primitive in V5.2. 2. SCTP Stream Management It is recommended that a separate SCTP stream be used for every Envelope Function Address used on a specific C-channel. When an EFA is used on more than one C-channel, one stream per c-channel and EFA is recommended. This means that one stream is used for BCC, Link Control, Common Con- trol, Protection and PSTN protocol on all c-channels the protocol is used. One stream is used for the signalling for every ISDN user port on all c-channels the data for this port is sent. In addition, it is recommended that one separate SCTP stream be used for all MPH (link related) messages. 3. Proposed V5.2 Backhaul Architecture Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 8] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 ****** V5.2 ****** IP ******* * AN *---------------* SG *--------------* MGC * ****** ****** ******* +-----+ +-----+ |V5.2 | (NIF) |V5.2 | +-----+ +----------+ +-----+ | | | |V5UA| |V5UA | | | | +----+ +-----+ |LAPV5| |LAPV5|SCTP| |SCTP | | | | +----+ +-----+ | | | | IP + | IP | +-----+ +-----+----+ +-----+ Figure 1 V5.2 Backhaul Architecture SCTP - Stream Control Transmission Protocol 3.1. V5UA Message Header The original IUA message header needs to be modified for V5. The ori- ginal header for the integer formatted Interface Identifier is shown below: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0x1) | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Interface Identifier (integer) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0x5) | Length=8 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | DLCI | Spare | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2 Original IUA Message Header For the V5 extension of the IUA Message Header, the Envelope Function Address (EFA) field is included in the last 13 bits of the Spare field. Below the V5UA format for the integer formatted Interface Iden- tifier is shown: Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 9] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0x1) | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Interface Identifier (integer) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0x5) | Length=8 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | DLCI |Spare| EFA | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 3 V5UA Message Header (Integer-based Interface identifier) The EFA identifies a C-path, which is a 13-bit number, ranging from 0 to 8191 (decimal). An EFA uniquely identifies one of the five V5.2 protocols, or an ISDN agent attached to an AN. The following list con- tains the possible values for the EFA: Definition Value ---------- ------ ISDN_PROTOCOL 0 - 8175 PSTN_PROTOCOL 8176 CC_PROTOCOL 8177 BCC_PROTOCOL 8178 PROT_PROTOCOL 8179 LINK_CONTROL_PROTOCOL 8180 RESERVED 8181 - 8191 The text formatted Interface Identifier SHALL not be supported due to the neccessary naming conventions for the Interface Identifier. 3.2. V5 Naming Conventions for Interface Identifier The V5 standard demands that V5 System Management keeps track of the states of all links on a V5 interface. To perform tasks like protec- tion switching and bearer channel allocation on the V5 links, it is neccessary that system management has the full picture of the signal- ling and bearer channels located on each link. The IUA protocol identifies C-Channels by endpoints without a defined association with a specific link. Since no naming convention exists, there is no guarantee that a C-Channel is actually located at the link it claims to be. Furthermore the V5 standard requires that the MGC receives reports of the status of all links, and it defines a link identification procedure to ensure that AN and LE are referencing the Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 10] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 same link when they address a link with a Link Control Protocol mes- sage. It would clearly be against the concept of V5.2 if there was no clear association between E1 links and channels. To solve this problem a naming convention MUST be used to ensure this association: The format of the integer formatted Interface Identifier is shown below: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Link Identifier | Chnl ID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Link Identifier - Identifier for an E1 link on the SG (27 bits). Must be unique on the SG. This Link Identifier MUST match the Link Identifier used in the Link Management Messages defined later in this document. Chnl ID - Channel Identifier (5 bits). This is equal to the time-slot number of the addressed time slot. Possible values are 15, 16 and 31 representing the possible time slots for C-Channels on a V5 interface. For Link Management Messages the Chnl ID must be set to 0. All other values are reserved for future use. 3.3. V5 Additions to IUA Boundary Primitives Some primitives for the V5 interface boundaries are similar to the Q.921/Q.931 boundary primitive messages defined in IUA, but they need to be handled in a different way. Therefore it is neccessary to dis- tinguish between these two message types by means of the Message Class parameter. For all V5 interface boundary primitives, a new Message Class is introduced: 9 V5 Boundary Primitives Transport Messages (V5PTM) Similar to IUA, other valid message classes for V5UA are: 0 Management (MGMT) Message 3 ASP State Maintenance (ASPSM) Messages 4 ASP Traffic Maintenance (ASPTM) Messages Q.921/Q.931 boundary primitive messages reused by V5.2 as QPTMV5 messages are: Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 11] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 1 Data Request Message (MGC -> SG) 2 Data Indication Message (SG -> MGC) 5 Establish Request (MGC -> SG) 6 Establish Confirm (SG -> MGC) 7 Establish Indication (SG -> MGC) 8 Release Request (MGC -> SG) 9 Release Confirm (SG -> MGC) 10 Release Indication (SG -> MGC) All these messages are defined similar to the QPTM messages. In addi- tion, Layer 1 boundary primitive messages are defined: 11 Link Status Start Reporting (MGC -> SG) 12 Link Status Stop Reporting (MGC -> SG) 13 Link Status Indication (SG -> MGC) 14 Sa-Bit Set Value (MGC -> SG) 15 Sa-Bit Set Ack (SG -> MGC) 16 Sa-Bit Status Request (MGC -> SG) 17 Sa-Bit Status Indication (SG -> MGC) 3.4. Link Status Messages (Start Reporting, Stop Reporting, Indica- tion) The Link Status Messages are used between V5 System Management on the MGC and the L1 FSM on the SG to track the status of a particular E1 link. This is required regardless of whether or not the E1 link car- ries c-channels. All Link Status Messages contain the V5UA Message Header. The Link Identifier portion of the Interface Identifier identifies the physical link on the SG addressed by the message. For all link status messages, the Chnl ID shall be set to '0' and shall be ignored by the receiver. The integer value used for the Link Identifier is of local signifi- cance only, coordinated between the SG and MGC. It has to be unique for the link on the SG. The Link Status Start Report Message is used for example by V5 System Management to request reporting from L1 FSM on the status of a partic- ular link, since V5 System Mangement on the MGC must know the status of the links on all active V5 interfaces. V5 system management will send this Message on Interface activation for all links on the inter- face. The SG will respond immediately to this request with a Link Status Indication message, and it will then send a Link Status Indica- tion message on all subsequent changes of the link status. To stop this reporting of the status of a link, e.g. at interface deactivation, System Management sends a Link Status Stop Report Mes- sage to the L1 FSM. The SG will then immediately stop reporting the status of the particular link. It must not respond in any way to this Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 12] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 message. The Link Status Start/Stop Report Messages contain the common message header followed by the V5UA message header. They do not contain any addition parameters. The Link Status Indication Message is used by L1 FSM in the SG in response to a Link Status Request Message to indicate the status of the particular link. After a Link Status Start Report Message has been received by the L1 FSM, it will automatically send a Link Status Indi- cation Message every time the status of the particular link changes. It will not stop this reporting until it receives a Link Status Stop Report Message from System Management. The Link Status Indication Message contains the common message header followed by the V5UA message header. In addition it contains the fol- lowing parameter: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0x11) | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Link Status | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ The valid values for Link Status are shown in the following table: Define Value Description OPERATIONAL 0x0 Link is in operation NON-OPERATIONAL 0x1 Link is not in operation 3.5. Sa-Bit Messages (Set, Set Ack, Status Request, Status Indica- tion) The Sa-Bit Messages are used between V5 System Management in the MGC and the L1 FSM in the SG to set and read the status of Sa bits on the E1 links. For V5 it is only required to set and read the status of the Sa7 bit that is used in the V5 defined Link Identification procedure. All Sa-Bit Messages contain the V5UA message header. The Link Identif- ier portion of the Interface Identifier identifies the physical link on the SG addressed by the message. For all link status messages, the Chnl ID shall be set to '0' and shall be ignored by the receiver. The Link Identifier must be the same as used in the Interface Identif- ier to identify on which link a C-channel is located. The Sa-Bit Set message is used to set the value of the specified Sa- Bit on the defined link. For V5, the value of the Sa7 bit in normal Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 13] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 operation is ONE. For the Link Identification procedure, it is set to ZERO. The SG MUST answer a Sa-Bit Set message with a Sa-Bit Set Ack message when the setting of the bit is complete. The Sa-Bit Status Request message is used by system management to request the status of the specified Sa-Bit on the defined link from L1 FSM. L1 FSM answers this request by a Sa-Bit Status Indication message in which the current setting of the bit will be reported. All Sa-Bit Messages contain the following additional parameter: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0x12) | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | BIT ID | Bit Value | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ The valid values for Bit Value are shown in the following table: Define Value Description ZERO 0x0 Bit is set to ZERO ONE 0x1 Bit is set to ONE The valid value for BIT ID is shown in the following table: Define Value Description Sa7 0x7 Addresses the Sa7 bit There are no other valid values for V5UA. All other values are reserved for future use. For the Sa-Bit Status Request and Set Ack messages, the BIT Value should be set to '0' by the sender and should be ignored by the receiver. 4. Examples 4.1. Link Identification Procedure (successful) An example for the message flow for an LE initiated Link Identifica- tion procedure is shown below. An active association between ASP and Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 14] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 SG is established prior to the following messages flows, and the V5 interface is already activated: ASP SG | | | ------ Data Request (LnkCtrl: FE-IDReq) ------> | | <-------------- Data Indication --------------- | | | | <------- Data Request (LnkCtrl: FE-IDAck) ----- | | ---------------- Data Indication -------------> | | | | ------ Sa-Bit Status Request ( Sa7 ) ---------> | | <--- Sa-Bit Status Indication ( Sa7, ZERO ) --- | | | | ------- Data Request (LnkCtrl: FE-IDRel) -----> | | <-------------- Data Indication --------------- | | | The next example again shows a Link Identification procedure, but this time initiated by the AN. Again the ASP association and the V5 inter- face are already in service: ASP SG | | | <------ Data Request (LnkCtrl: FE-IDReq) ------ | | ---------------- Data Indication -------------> | | | | ---------- Sa-Bit Set ( Sa7, ZERO ) ----------> | | <--------- Sa-Bit Set Ack (Sa7) --------------- | | | | ------- Data Request (LnkCtrl: FE-IDAck) -----> | | <----------------- Data Indication -----------> | | | | <------ Data Request (LnkCtrl: FE-IDRel) ------ | | ---------------- Data Indication -------------> | | | | ------------ Sa-Bit Set ( Sa7, ONE ) ---------> | | <----------- Sa-Bit Set Ack (Sa 7) ------------ | | | 5. IANA Considerations Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 15] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 5.1. SCTP Payload Protocol Identifiers A request will be made to IANA to assign an V5UA value for the Payload Protocol Identifier in SCTP Payload Data chunk. The following SCTP Payload Protocol Identifier will be registered: V5UA "?" The SCTP Payload Protocol Identifier is included in each SCTP Data chunk, to indicate which protocol the SCTP is carrying. This Payload Protocol Identifier is not directly used by SCTP but MAY be used by certain network entities to identify the type of information being carried in a Data chunk. The User Adaptation peer MAY use the Payload Protocol Identifier as a way of determining additional information about the data being presented to it by SCTP. 6. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Milos Pujic, Graeme Currie for their valuable comments and suggestions. 7. References [1] ISDN Q.921-User Adaptation Layer [2] EN 300 324-1 (1999): V interfaces at the digital Local Exchange (LE); V5.1 interface for the support of Access Network (AN); Part 1: V5.1 interface specification. [3] EN 300 347-1 (1999): V interfaces at the digital Local Exchange (LE); V5.2 interface for the support of Access Network (AN); Part 1: V5.2 interface specification. [4] ETS 300 125 (1991) : DSS1 protocol; User-Network interface data link layer specification; (Standard is based on : ITU Q.920, Q.921). [5] ETS 300 166 (08/1993) : Transmission and Multiplexing; Physical and electrical characteristic of hierarchical digital interfaces (Standard is based on G.703). [6] ETS 300 167 (08/1993) : Transmission and Multiplexing; Functional characteristic of 2048 kbits/s interfaces (Standard is based on G.704, G.706). Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 16] Internet Draft V5.2-User Adaption Layer November, 2000 8. Author's Addresses Dr. Eva Weilandt Tel +49 7545 96 7267 Nortel Networks Germany Email eva.weilandt@nortelnetworks.com 88039 Friedrichshafen Germany Sanjay Rao Tel +1-919-991-2251 Nortel Networks Email rsanjay@nortelnetworks.com 35 Davis Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA Neeraj Khanchandani Tel +1-919-991-2274 Nortel Networks Email neerajk@nortelnetworks.com 35 Davis Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA Dr. Fahir Ergincan Tel +49 7545 96 8844 Nortel Networks Germany Email fahir@nortelnetworks.com 88039 Friedrichshafen Germany This Draft Expires in 6 months from February,2001 Weilandt,Khanchandani,Ergincan,Rao [Page 17]