| draft-ietf-sigtran-m2ua-04Description: Request For CommentsYou can download source copies of the file as follows:
Listed below is the contents of file draft-ietf-sigtran-m2ua-04.txt.
Network Working Group Ken Morneault
INTERNET-DRAFT Cisco Systems
Mallesh Kalla
Telcordia
Greg Sidebottom
Nortel Networks
Ram Dantu
IPMobile
Tom George
Alcatel
Expires in six months March 2000
SS7 MTP2-User Adaptation Layer
<draft-ietf-sigtran-m2ua-04.txt>
Status of This Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all
provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as 'work in progress.'
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
'1id-abstracts.txt' listing contained in the Internet- Drafts Shadow
Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net (Europe),
munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ftp.ietf.org (US East Coast), or
ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
Abstract
This Internet Draft defines a protocol for backhauling of SS7 MTP2
User signaling messages over IP using the Simple Control Transmission
Protocol (SCTP). This protocol would be used between a Signaling
Gateway (SG) and Media Gateway Controller (MGC). It is assumed that
the SG receives SS7 signaling over a standard SS7 interface using the
SS7 Message Transfer Part (MTP) to provide transport. The Signaling
Gateway would act as a Signaling Link Terminal.
Morneault, et al [Page 1]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction..............................................2
1.1 Scope..................................................2
1.2 Terminology............................................3
1.3 Signaling Transport Architecture.......................3
1.4 Services Provide by the M2UA Adaptation Layer..........6
1.5 Function Provided by the M2UA Layer....................8
1.6 Definition of the M2UA Boundaries......................9
2. Conventions...............................................9
3. Protocol Elements.........................................9
3.1 Common Message Header.................................10
3.2 M2UA Message Header...................................11
3.3 M2UA Messages.........................................11
4. Procedures...............................................20
4.1 Procedures to Support Service in Section 1.4.1........20
4.2 Procedures to Support Service in Section 1.4.2........21
4.3 Procedures to Support Service in Section 1.4.3........21
5. Examples of MTP2 User Adaptation (M2UA) Procedures.......26
5.1 Establishment of associations between SG and MGC......26
examples
5.2 MTP Level 2 / MTP Level 3 Boundary Examples...........28
5.3 Layer Management Communication Examples...............29
6. Security.................................................30
7. IANA Considerations......................................31
8. Acknowledgements.........................................31
9. References...............................................32
10. Author's Addresses.......................................33
Morneault, et al [Page 2]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
1. Introduction
1.1 Scope
There is a need for SCN signaling protocol delivery from an Signaling
Gateway (SG) to a Media Gateway Controller (MGC) or IP Signaling Point
(IPSP). The delivery mechanism should meet the following criteria:
* Support for MTP Level 2 / MTP Level 3 interface boundary
* Support for communication between Layer Management modules on SG and
MGC
* Support for management of active associations between the SG and MGC
In other words, the Signaling Gateway will transport MTP Level 3
messages to a Media Gateway Controller (MGC) or IP Signaling Point
(IPSP). In the case of delivery from an SG to an IPSP, both the SG and
IPSP function as traditional SS7 nodes using the IP network as a new
type of SS7 link. This allows for full MTP Level 3 message handling
and network management capabilities.
1.2 Terminology
MTP2-User - A protocol that normally uses the services of MTP Level 2
(i.e. MTP3).
Interface - For the purposes of this document, an interface is a SS7
signaling link.
Association - An association refers to a SCTP association. The
association will provide the transport for the delivery of protocol
data units for one or more interfaces.
Backhaul - Refers to the transport of signaling from the point of
interface for the associated data stream (i.e., SG function in the MGU)
back to the point of call processing (i.e., the MGCU), if this is not
local [4].
Application Server (AS) - A logical entity serving a specific application
instance. An example of an Application Server is a MGC handling the
MTP Level 3 and call processing for SS7 links terminated by the
Signaling Gateways. Practically speaking, an AS is modeled at the SG
as an ordered list of one or more related Application Server Processes
(e.g., primary, secondary, tertiary, ...).
Application Server Process (ASP) - A process instance of an Application
Server. Examples of Application Server Processes are primary or backup
MGC instances.
Application Server Process Path (ASP Path or just Path) - A Path to a
remote Application Server Process instance. A Path maps 1:1 to an SCTP
association.
Fail-over - The capability to re-route signaling traffic as required
to an alternate Application Server Process, or group of ASPs, within
an Application Server in the event of failure or unavailability of a
currently used Application Server Process. Fail-back may apply upon
the return to service of a previously unavailable Application Server
Process.
Morneault, et al [Page 3]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
Signaling Link Terminal (SLT) - Refers to the means of performing all
of the functions defined at MTP level 2 regardless of their
implementation [2].
Network Byte Order: Most significant byte first, a.k.a Big Endian.
Layer Management - Layer Management is a nodal function in an SG or
ASP that handles the inputs and outputs between the M2UA layer and a
local management entity.
Host - The computing platform that the ASP process is running on.
Stream - A stream refers to an SCTP stream.
1.3 Signaling Transport Architecture
The framework architecture that has been defined for SCN signaling
transport over IP [5] uses multiple components, including a signaling
common transport protocol and an adaptation module to support the
services expected by a particular SCN signaling protocol from its
underlying protocol layer.
Within this framework architecture, this document defines a SCN
adaptation module that is suitable for the transport of SS7 MTP2 User
messages. The only SS7 MTP2 User is MTP3. The M2UA uses the services
of the Simple Common Transport protocol [6] as the underlying reliable
signaling common transport protocol.
In a Signaling Gateway, it is expected that the SS7 MTP2-User signaling
is transmitted and received from the PSTN over a standard SS7 network
interface, using the SS7 Message Transfer Part Level 1 and Level 2 [3,4]
to provide reliable transport of the MTP3-User signaling messages to and
from an SS7 Signaling End Point (SEP) or Signaling Transfer Point (STP).
The SG then provides a functional inter-working of transport functions
with the IP transport, in order to transfer the MTP2-User signaling
messages to and from an Application Server Process where the peer MTP2-
User protocol layer exists.
1.3.1 Example - SG to MGC
In a Signaling Gateway, it is expected that the SS7 signaling is
received over a standard SS7 network termination, using the SS7 Message
Transfer Part (MTP) to provide transport of SS7 signaling messages to
and from an SS7 Signaling End Point (SEP) or SS7 Signaling Transfer
Point (STP). In other words, the SG acts as a Signaling Link Terminal
(SLT) [2]. The SG then provides interworking of transport functions
with IP Signaling Transport, in order to transport the MTP3 signaling
messages to the MGC where the peer MTP3 protocol layer exists, as shown
below:
Morneault, et al [Page 4]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
****** SS7 ****** IP *******
*SEP *-----------* SG *-------------* MGC *
****** ****** *******
+----+ +----+
|S7UP| |S7UP|
+----+ +----+
|MTP + |MTP |
| L3 | (NIF) |L3 |
+----+ +----+----+ +----+
|MTP | |MTP |M2UA| |M2UA|
| | | +----+ +----+
|L2 | |L2 |SCTP| |SCTP|
|L1 | |L1 +----+ +----+
| | | |IP | |IP |
+----+ +---------+ +----+
NIF - Nodal Interworking Function
SEP - SS7 Signaling Endpoint
IP - Internet Protocol
SCTP - Simple Control Transmission Protocol
(Refer to Reference [5])
Figure 1 M2UA in the SG to MGC Application
Note: STPs may be present in the SS7 path between the SEP and the SG.
1.3.2 Signaling Network Architecture
A Signaling Gateway will support the transport of MTP2-User signaling
traffic received from the SS7 network to one or more distributed ASPs
(e.g., MGCs). Clearly, the M2UA protocol description cannot in itself
meet any performance and reliability requirements for such transport.
A physical network architecture is required, with data on the
availability and transfer performance of the physical nodes involved in
any particular exchange of information. However, the M2UA protocol must
be flexible enough allow its operation and management in a variety of
physical configurations that will enable Network Operators to meet
their performance and reliability requirements.
To meet the stringent SS7 signaling reliability and performance
requirements for carrier grade networks, these Network Operators should
ensure that there is no single point of failure provisioned in the end-
to-end network architecture between an SS7 node and an IP ASP. Depending
of course on the reliability of the SG and ASP functional elements, this
can typically be met by the spreading links in a linkset across SGs, the
provision of redundant QOS-bounded IP network paths for SCTP Associations
between SCTP End Points, and redundant Hosts. The distribution of ASPs
within the available Hosts is also important. For a particular
Application Server, the related ASPs should be distributed over at least
two Hosts.
An example physical network architecture relevant to carrier-grade
operation in the IP network domain is shown in Figure 2 below:
Morneault, et al [Page 5]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
******** **************
* *_________________________________________* ******** * Host1
* * _________* * ASP1 * *
* SG1 * SCTP Associations | * ******** *
* *_______________________ | * *
******** | | **************
| |
******** | |
* *_______________________________|
* * |
* SG2 * SCTP Associations |
* *____________ |
* * | |
******** | | **************
| |_________________* ******** * Host2
|____________________________* * ASP1 * *
* ******** *
* *
**************
.
.
.
Figure 2 - Physical Model Example
For carrier grade networks, Operators should ensure that under failure
or isolation of a particular ASP, stable calls or transactions are not
lost. This implies that ASPs need, in some cases, to share the call/-
transaction state or be able to pass the call/transaction state between
each other. Also, in the case of ASPs performing call processing,
coordination may be required with the related Media Gateway to transfer
the MGC control for a particular trunk termination. However, this
sharing or communication is outside the scope of this document.
1.3.4 ASP Fail-over Model and Terminology
The M2UA supports ASP fail-over functions in order to support a high
availability of call and transaction processing capability. All MTP2-
User messages incoming to an SG from the SS7 network are assigned to a
unique Application Server, based on the Interface Identifier of the
message.
The Application Server is in practical terms a list of all ASPs currently
registered to process MTP2-User messages from certain Interface
Identifiers. One or more ASPs in the list are normally active (i.e.,
handling traffic) while any others may be unavailable or inactive, to be
possibly used in the event of failure or unavailability of the active
ASP(s).
The fail-over model supports an �n+k� redundancy model, where �n� ASPs
is the minimum number of redundant ASPs required to handle traffic and
�k� ASPs are available to take over for a failed or unavailable ASP.
Note that �1+1� active/standby redundancy is a subset of this model.
A simplex �1+0� model is also supported as a subset, with no ASP
redundancy.
Morneault, et al [Page 6]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
To avoid a single point of failure, it is recommended that a minimum of
two ASPs be in the list, resident in separate hosts and therefore
available over different SCTP Associations. For example, in the
network shown in Figure 1, all messages to DPC x could be sent to ASP1
in Host1 or ASP1 in Host2. The AS list at SG1 might look like this:
Interface Identiers - Application Server #1
ASP1/Host1 - State=Up, Active
ASP1/Host2 - State=Up, Inactive
In this �1+1� redundancy case, ASP1 in Host1 would be sent any incoming
message for the Interface Identifiers registered. ASP1 in Host2 would
normally be brought to the active state upon failure of, or loss of
connectivity to, ASP1/Host1. In this example, both ASPs are Up, meaning
that the related SCTP association and far-end M2UA peer is ready.
The AS List at SG1 might also be set up in loadshare mode:
Interface Identifiers - Application Server #1
ASP1/Host1 - State = Up, Active
ASP1/Host2 - State = Up, Active
In this case, both the ASPs would be sent a portion of the traffic.
In the process of fail-over or fail-back, it is recommended that in the
case of ASPs supporting call processing, stable calls do not fail. It
is possible that calls in �transition� may fail, although measures of
communication between the ASPs involved can be used to mitigate this.
For example, the two ASPs may share call state via shared memory, or may
use an ASP to ASP protocol to pass call state information.
1.3.5 Client/Server Model
It is recommended that the SG take on the role of server while the
ASP is the client. ASPs should initiate the SCTP association to the
SG.
The SCTP (and UDP/TCP) Registered User Port Number Assignment for M2UA
is 2904.
1.4 Services Provided by the M2UA Adaptation Layer
The SS7 MTP3/MTP2(MTP2-User) interface is retained at the termination
point in the IP network, so that the M2UA protocol layer is required to
provide the equivalent set of services to its users as provided by the
MTP Level 2 to MTP Level 3.
This includes the following services:
1.4.1 Support for MTP Level 2 / MTP Level 3 interface boundary
Also provision is made for protocol elements that enable a seamless, or
as seamless as possible, operation of the MTP2-User peers in the SS7 and
IP domains. This includes
Data
Provides the ability to transport MTP2 User information (in this case,
MTP Level 3 PDUs).
Morneault, et al [Page 7]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
Link Establish
Provides the ability to request MTP Level 2 to bring SS7 links
in-service.
Link Release
Provides the ability to request MTP Level 2 to take SS7 links out-of-
service. Also, provides mechanism for MTP2 to autonomously indicate
that SS7 link(s) have gone out-of-service.
Link State
Provides the ability to request state change or information on a
per link basis. Some examples would be the forcing of Local Processor
Outage or flushing buffers.
Link Status
Provides a means for asynchronous notification of link state changes to
be reported to the upper layer (MTP Level 3). An example would be the
reporting of remote processor outage event.
Data Retrieval
Provides a mechanism to perform SS7 link changeover procedure in
the case of a SS7 link failure.
1.4.2 Support for communication between Layer Management modules
on SG and MGC
It is envisioned that the M2UA layer needs to provide some messages that
will facilitate communication between Layer Management modules on the SG
and MGC.
To facilitate reporting of errors that arise because of backhauling MTP
Level 3 scenario, the following primitive is defined:
M-ERROR
The M-ERROR message is used to indicate an error with a received
M2UA message (e.g., interface identifier value is not known to the SG).
1.4.3 Support for management of active associations between SG and MGC
The M2UA layer on the SG keeps the state of various ASPs it is associated
with. A set of primitives between M2UA layer and the Layer Management
are defined below to help the Layer Management manage the association(s)
between the SG and the MGC.
M-SCTP ESTABLISH
The M-SCTP ESTABLISH primitive is used to request, indicate and confirm
the establishment of SCTP association to a peer M2UA node.
The M2UA layer may also need to inform the status of the SCTP
association(s) to the Layer Management. This can be achieved using
the following primitive.
Morneault, et al [Page 8]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
M-SCTP STATUS
The M-SCTP STATUS primitive is used to request and indicate the status
of underlying SCTP association(s).
The Layer Management may need to inform the M2UA layer of a user status
(i.e., failure, active, etc.), so that messages can be exchanged between
M2UA layer peers to stop traffic to the local M2UA user. This can be
achieved using the following primitive.
M-ASP STATUS
The M-ASP STATUS primitive is used by the Layer Management to indicate
the status of the local M2UA user to the M2UA layer.
1.5 Functions Provided by the M2UA Layer
1.5.1 Mapping
The M2UA layer must maintain a map of a Interface ID to a physical
interface on the Signaling Gateway. A physical interface would be a
V.35 line, T1 line/timeslot, E1 line/timeslot, etc. The M2UA layer
must also maintain a map of Interface Identifier to SCTP association
and to the related stream within the association.
1.5.2 Flow Control / Congestion
It is possible for the M2UA layer to be informed of IP network congestion
by means of an implementation-dependent function (i.e. an indication
from the SCTP). If the M2UA layer receives this indication, the action(s)
taken are implementation dependent.
1.5.3 SCTP Stream Management
SCTP allows user specified number of streams to be opened during the
initialization. It is the responsibility of the M2UA layer to ensure
proper management of these streams. SCTP streams provide a means for
avoiding head of line blocking. For that reason, a stream should be used
per SS7 signaling link terminated by the Signaling Gateway. The SS7
signaling link can be identified by the optional Interface Identifier
in the M2UA specific message header (refer to Section 2.2).
1.5.4 Seamless SS7 Network Management Interworking
If the SG loses the SCTP association to the MGC, it should follow
MTP 2 processor outage procedures [2].
Morneault, et al [Page 9]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
1.5.5 Active Association Control
At an SG, an Application Server list may contain active and inactive
ASPs to support ASP loads-haring and fail-over procedures. When, for
example, both a primary and a back-up ASP are available, M2UA peer
protocol is required to control which ASP is currently active. The
ordered list of ASPs within a logical Application Server is kept
updated in the SG to reflect the active Application Server Process(es).
1.6 Definition of the M2UA Boundaries
1.6.1 Definition of the M2UA / MTP Level 3 boundary
DATA
ESTABLISH
RELEASE
STATE
STATUS
RETRIEVAL
DATA RETRIEVAL
DATA RETRIEVAL COMPLETE
1.6.2 Definition of the M2UA / MTP Level 2 boundary
DATA
ESTABLISH
RELEASE
STATE
STATUS
RETRIEVAL
DATA RETRIEVAL
DATA RETRIEVAL COMPLETE
1.6.3 Definition of the Lower Layer Boundary between M2UA and SCTP
The upper layer and layer management primitives provided by SCTP are
provided in Reference [6] Section 9.
1.6.4 Definition of Layer Management / M2UA Boundary
M-ERROR
M-SCTP ESTABLISH
M-SCTP STATUS
M-ASP STATUS
2.0 Conventions
The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD
NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear
in this document, are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3.0 Protocol Elements
This section describes the format of various messages used in this
protocol.
Morneault, et al [Page 10]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
3.1 Common Message Header
The protocol messages for MTP2-User Adaptation require a message
structure which contains a version, message type, message length, and
message contents. This message header is common among all signaling
protocol adaptation layers:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version | Spare | Message Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Message Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3 Common Message Header
All fields in an M2UA message MUST be transmitted in the network byte
order, unless otherwise stated.
3.1.1 Version
The version field (vers) contains the version of the M2UA adapation
layer. The supported versions are:
Release 1.0 0x1
3.1.2 Message Type
The valid message types are defined in Section 3.2.2 and the message
contents are described in Section 3.3. Each message can contain
parameters.
The following list contains the message types for the defined messages.
MTP2 User Adaptatation (MAUP) Messages
Data 0x0601
Establish Request 0x0602
Establish Confirm 0x0603
Release Request 0x0604
Release Confirm 0x0605
Release Indication 0x0606
State Request 0x0607
State Confirm 0x0608
State Indication 0x0609
Data Retrieval Request 0x060a
Data Retrieval Confirm 0x060b
Data Retrieval Indication 0x060c
Data Retrieval Complete Indication 0x060d
Application Server Process Maintenance (ASPM) Messages
ASP Up 0x0301
ASP Down 0x0302
Heartbeat 0x0303
ASP Up Ack 0x0304
ASP Down Ack 0x0305
ASP Active 0x0401
ASP Inactive 0x0402
ASP Active 0x0403
ASP Inactive 0x0404
Morneault, et al [Page 11]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
Management (MGMT) Messages
Error 0x0000
Notify 0x0001
3.1.3 Message Length
The Message length defines the length of the message in octets, not
including the header.
3.1.4 Variable-Length Parameter Format
IUA messages consist of a Common Header followed by zero or more
variable-length parameters, as defined by the message type. The
variable-length parameters contained in a message are defined in a
Tag-Length-Value format as shown below.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Parameter Tag | Parameter Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ \
/ Parameter Value /
\ \
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Parameter Tag: 16 bits (unsigned integer)
The Type field is a 16 bit identifier of the type of parameter. It takes
a value of 0 to 65534.
The value of 65535 is reserved for IETF-defined extensions. Values
other than those defined in specific parameter description are reserved
for use by the IETF.
Parameter Length: 16 bits (unsigned integer)
The Parameter Length field contains the size of the parameter in bytes,
including the Parameter Tag, Parameter Length, and Parameter Value
fields. Thus, a parameter with a zero-length Parameter Value field
would have a Length field of 4. The Parameter Length does not include
any padding bytes.
Parameter Value: variable-length.
The Parameter Value field contains the actual information to be
transferred in the parameter.
The total length of a parameter (including Tag, Parameter Length and Value
fields) MUST be a multiple of 4 bytes. If the length of the parameter is
not a multiple of 4 bytes, the sender pads the Parameter at the end (i.e.,
after the Parameter Value field) with all zero bytes. The length of the
padding is NOT included in the parameter length field. A sender should
NEVER pad with more than 3 bytes. The receiver MUST ignore the padding
bytes.
3.2 M2UA Message Header
In addition to the common message header, there will be a M2UA specific
message header. The M2UA specific message header will immediately
follow the common message header, but will only be used with MAUP
messages.
This message header will contain the Interface Identifier. The
Interface Identifier identifies the physical interface at the SG for
which the signaling messages are sent/received. The format of the
Interface Identifier parameter is an integer, the values of which are
assigned according to network operator policy. The values used are of
local significance only, coordinated between the SG and ASP.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x1) | Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Interface Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4 M2UA Message Header
The Tag value for Interface Identifier is 0x1. The length is always
set to a value of 8.
3.3 M2UA Messages
The following section defines the messages and parameter contents. The
M2UA messages will use the common message header (Figure 3) and the
M2UA message header (Figure 4).
3.3.1 MTP2 User Adaptation Messages
3.3.1.1 Data
The Data message contains an SS7 MTP2-User Protocol Data Unit (PDU). The
Data message contains the protocol data.
Morneault, et al [Page 12]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
The format for the Data Message parameters is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Protocol Data |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Protocol Data field contains the MTP2-User application message in
network byte order.
3.3.1.2 Establish (Request, Confirmation)
The Establish Request message is used to establish the link or to
indicate that the channel has been established. Note that the gateway
may already have the SS7 link established at its layer. If so, upon
receipt of an Establish Request, the gateway takes no action except to
send an Establish Confirm.
The mode (Normal of Emergency) for bringing the link in service is
defaulted to Normal. The State Request (described in Section 3.3.1.4
below) can be used to change the mode to Emergency.
3.3.1.3 Release (Request, Indication, Confirmation)
This Release Request message is used to release the channel. The
Release Confirm and Indication messages are used to indicate that the
channel has been released.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reason |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The valid values for Reason are shown in the following table.
Define Value Description
RELEASE_MGMT 0x0 Management layer generated release
RELEASE_PHYS 0x1 Physical layer alarm generated release
RELEASE_SIOS 0x2 Receipt of SIOS
RELEASE_T6 0x3 Release due to expiration of Timer T6
RELEASE_T7 0x4 Release due to expiration of Timer T7
RELEASE_BSN 0x5 Release due to invalid BSN (2 of 3)
RELEASE_FIB 0x6 Release due to invalid FIB (2 of 3)
RELEASE_SUERM 0x7 Release due to failure reported by SUERM
RELEASE_IAC 0x8 Release due to initial alignment failed
RELEASE_OTHER 0x9 Other reason SS7 link out-of-service
3.3.1.4 State (Request, Confirm)
The State Request message can be sent from a MGC to cause an action
on a particular SS7 link supported by the Signaling Gateway. The
gateway sends a State Confirm to the MGC if the action has been success-
fully completed. The State Confirm reflects that state value received
in the State Request message.
Morneault, et al [Page 13]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| State |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The valid values for State are shown in the following table.
Define Value Description
STATUS_LPO_SET 0x0 Request local processor outage
STATUS_LPO_CLEAR 0x1 Request local processor outage
recovered
STATUS_EMER_SET 0x2 Request emergency alignment
procedure
STATUS_EMER_CLEAR 0x3 Request normal alignment (cancel
emergency) procedure
STATUS_FLUSH_BUFFERS 0x4 Flush transmit and retransmit
buffers
STATUS_CONTINUE 0x5 Continue
3.3.1.5 State Indication
The MTP2 State Indication message can be sent from a gateway to an
ASP to indicate a condition on a link.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| State |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The valid values for State are shown in the following table.
Define Value Description
EVENT_ENTER_LPO 0x0 Entered local processor outage
EVENT_EXIT_LPO 0x1 Exited local processor outage
EVENT_ENTER_CONG 0x2 Entered a congested state
EVENT_EXIT_CONG 0x3 Exited a congested state
EVENT_PHYS_UP 0x4 Physical interface up
EVENT_PHYS_DOWN 0x5 Physical interface down
EVENT_PROTOCOL_ERR 0x6 Protocol error occurred
EVENT_REM_ENTER_CONG 0xc Remote entered congestion
EVENT_REM_EXIT_CONG 0xd Remote exited congestion
EVENT_REM_ENTER_PO 0xe Remote entered processor outage
EVENT_REM_EXIT_PO 0xf Remote exited processor outage
3.3.1.6 Retrieval (Request, Confirm)
The MTP2 Retrieval Request message is used during the MTP Level 3
changeover procedure to request the BSN, to retrieve PDUs from the
retransmit queue or to flush PDUs from the retransmit queue.
Morneault, et al [Page 14]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Action |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| fsn_bsn |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The valid values for Action are shown in the following table.
Define Value Description
ACTION_RTRV_BSN 0x1 Retrieve the backward sequence number
ACTION_RTRV_MSGS 0x2 Retrieve the PDUs from the retransmit
queue
ACTION_DROP_MSGS 0x3 Drop the PDUs in the retransmit queue
In the Retrieval Request message, the fsn_bsn field contains the FSN of
the far end if the action is ACTION_RTRV_MSGS.
When the Signaling Gateway sends a Retrieval Confirm to this request,
it echos the action and puts the BSN in the fsn_bsn field if the action
was ACTION_RTRV_BSN. If there is a failure in retrieving the BSN, the
fsn_bsn should contain a -1 (0xffffffff).
3.3.1.7 Retrieval Indication
The Retrieval Indication message is sent by the Signaling Gateway
with a PDU from the retransmit queue. The Retrieval Indication
message does not contain the Action or fsn_bsn fields, just a PDU from
the retransmit queue.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PDU from retransmit queue |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
3.3.1.8 Retrieval Complete Indication
The MTP2 Retrieval Complete Indication message is exactly the same as
the MTP2 Retrieval Indication message except that it also indicates that
it contains the last PDU from the retransmit queue.
3.3.2 Application Server Process Maintenance (ASPM) Messages
The ASPM messages will only use the common message header.
3.3.2.1 ASP UP (ASPUP)
The ASP UP (ASPUP) message is used to indicate to a remote M2UA peer
that the Adaptation layer is ready to receive traffic or maintenance
messages.
Morneault, et al [Page 15]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
The ASPUP message contains the following parameters:
Adaptation Layer Identifer (optional)
Protocol Identifier (optional)
INFO String (optional)
The format for ASPUP Message parameters is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x2) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Adaptation Layer Identifier* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The optional INFO String parameter can carry any meaningful 8-bit ASCII
character string along with the message. Length of the INFO String
parameter is from 0 to 255 characters. No procedures are presently
identified for its use but the INFO String may be used for debugging
purposes.
The optional Adaptation Layer Identifier (ALI) is a string that
identifies the adaptation layer. This string must be set to "M2UA"
which results in a length of 8. The ALI would normally only be used in
the initial ASP Up message across a new SCTP association to ensure both
peers are assuming the same adaptation layer protocol.
Morneault, et al [Page 16]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
3.3.3.2 ASP Up Ack
The ASP UP Ack message is used to acknowledge an ASP-Up message received
from a remote IUA peer.
The ASPUP Ack message contains the following parameters:
Adaptation Layer Identifer (optional)
INFO String (optional)
The format for ASPUP Ack Message parameters is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x2) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Adaptation Layer Identifier* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The format and description of the optional Info String parameter is the
same as for the ASP UP message (See Section 3.3.3.1.)
The format and description of the optional Adaptation Layer Identifier (ALI)
parameter is the same as for the ASP UP message (See Section 3.3.3.1).
3.3.3.3 ASP Down (ASPDN)
The ASP Down (ASPDN) message is used to indicate to a remote IUA peer
that the adaptation layer is not ready to receive traffic or
maintenance messages.
The ASPDN message contains the following parameters
Reason
INFO String (Optional)
The format for the ASPDN message parameters is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reason |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The format and description of the optional Info String parameter is the
same as for the ASP Up message (See Section 3.3.2.1.)
The Reason parameter indicates the reason that the remote M2UA
adaptation layer is unavailable. The valid values for Reason are shown
in the following table.
Value Description
0x1 Management Inhibit
3.4.4 ASP Down Ack
The ASP Down Ack message is used to acknowledge an ASP-Down message
received from a remote IUA peer.
The ASP Down Ack message contains the following parameters:
Reason
INFO String (Optional)
The format for the ASPDN Ack message parameters is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reason |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The format and description of the optional Info String parameter is the
same as for the ASP UP message (See Section 3.3.3.1.)
The format of the Reason parameter is the same as for the ASP-Down message
(See Section 3.3.3.3).
3.3.3.5 ASP Active (ASPAC)
The ASPAC message is sent by an ASP to indicate to an SG that it is
Active and ready to be used.
The ASPAC message contains the following parameters
Type
Interface Identifier (Optional)
INFO String (Optional)
The format for the ASPAC message is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0xx) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Interface Identifiers* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Type parameter identifies the traffic mode of operation of the ASP
within an AS. The valid values for Type are shown in the following
table.
Value Description
0x1 Over-ride
0x2 Load-share
Within a particular Interface Identifier, only one Type can be used.
The Over-ride value indicates that the ASP is operating in Over-ride
mode, where the ASP takes over all traffic in an Application Server
(i.e., primary/back-up operation), over-riding any currently active
ASPs in the AS. In Load-share mode, the ASP will share in the
traffic distribution with any other currently active ASPs.
Morneault, et al [Page 17]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
The optional Interface Identifiers parameter contains a list of
Interface Identifier integers indexing the Application Server traffic
that the sending ASP is configured/registered to receive. There is
one-to-one relationship between an Interface Identifier and an AS
Name.
An SG that receives an ASPAC with an incorrect type for a particular
Interface Identifier will respond with an Error Message.
The format and description of the optional Info String parameter is the
same as for the ASP UP message (See Section 3.3.3.1.)
A node that receives an ASPAC with an incorrect Type for a particular
Interface Identifier will respond with an Error Message (Cause: Invalid
Traffic Handling Mode).
3.3.3.6 ASP Active Ack
The ASPAC Ack message is used to acknowledge an ASP-Active message
received from a remote IUA peer.
The ASPAC Ack message contains the following parameters:
Type
Interface Identifier (Optional)
INFO String (Optional)
The format for the ASPAC Ack message is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x1) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Interface Identifiers* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The format and description of the optional Info String parameter is the
same as for the ASP UP message (See Section 3.3.3.1.)
The format of the Type and Interface Identifier parameters is the same
as for the ASP Active message (See Section 3.3.3.5).
3.3.3.7 ASP Inactive (ASPIA)
The ASPIA message is sent by an ASP to indicate to an SG that it is no
longer an active ASP to be used from within a list of ASPs. The SG will
respond with an ASPIA message and either discard incoming messages or
buffer for a timed period and then discard.
The ASPIA message contains the following parameters
Type
Interface Identifiers (Optional)
INFO String (Optional)
The format for the ASPIA message parameters is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x1) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Interface Identifiers* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Type parameter identifies the traffic mode of operation of the ASP
within an AS. The valid values for Type are shown in the following table.
Value Description
0x1 Over-ride
0x2 Load-share
The format and description of the optional Interface Identifiers and
Info String parameters is the same as for the ASP Active message (See
Section 3.3.3.3.)
The optional Interface Identifiers parameter contains a list of
Interface Identifier integers indexing the Application Server traffic
that the sending ASP is configured/registered to receive, but does not
want to receive at this time.
3.3.3.8 ASP Inactive Ack
The ASPIA Ack message is used to acknowledge an ASP-Inactive message
received from a remote IUA peer.
The ASPIA Ack message contains the following parameters:
Type
Routing Context (Optional)
INFO String (Optional)
The format for the ASPIA Ack message is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x6) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Routing Context* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The format and description of the optional Info String parameter is
the same as for the ASP UP message (See Section 3.3.3.1.)
The format of the Type and Routing Context parameters is the same as
for the ASP-Inctive message (See Section 3.3.3.7).
3.4.9 Heartbeat (BEAT)
The Heartbeat message is optionally used to ensure that the IUA peers
are still available to each other. It is recommended for use when
the IAU runs over a transport layer other than the SCTP, which has its
own heartbeat.
The BEAT message contains no parameters.
3.3.3 Layer Management (MGMT) Messages
3.3.3.1 Error (ERR)
The Error message is used to notify a peer of an error event
associated with an incoming message. For example, the message type
might be unexpected given the current state, or a parameter value might
be invalid.
The ERR message contains the following parameters:
Error Code
Diagnostic Information (optional)
The format for the ERR message is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Error Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0xx) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Diagnostic Information* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Error Code parameter indicates the reason for the Error Message.
The Error parameter value can be one of the following values:
Invalid Version 0x1
Invalid Interface Identifier 0x2
Invalid Adaptation Layer Identifier 0x3
Invalid Message Type 0x4
Invalid Traffic Handling Mode 0x5
Unexpected Message 0x6
Protocol Error 0x7
Invalid Stream Identifier 0x8
The optional Diagnostic information can be any information germain to
the error condition, to assist in identification of the error condition.
In the case of an Invalid Version Error Code the Diagnostic information
includes the supported Version parameter. In the other cases, the
Diagnostic information may be the first 40 bytes of the offending message.
Morneault, et al [Page 19]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
3.3.3.2 Notify (NTFY)
The Notify message used to provide an autonomous indication of IUA
events to an IUA peer.
The NTFY message contains the following parameters:
Status Type
Status Identification
Interface Identifiers (Optional)
INFO String (Optional)
The format for the NTFY message is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Status Type | Status Identification |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x1) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Interface Identifiers* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Tag (0x4) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| INFO String* |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Status Type parameter identifies the type of the Notify message.
The following are the valid Status Type values:
Value Description
0x1 Application Server state change (AS_State_Change)
0x2 Other
The Status Information parameter contains more detailed information for
the notification, based on the value of the Status Type. If the Status
Type is AS_State_Change the following Status Information values are used:
Value Description
0x1 Application Server Down (AS_Down)
0x2 Application Server Up (AS_Up)
0x3 Application Server Active (AS_Active)
0x4 Application Server Pending (AS_Pending)
0x5 Alternate ASP Active
These notifications are sent from an SG to an ASP upon a change in status
of a particular Application Server. The value reflects the new state of
the Application Server.
If the Status Type is Other, then the following Status Information values
are defined:
Value Description
0x1 Insufficient ASP resources active in AS
This notification is not based on the SG reporting the state change of an
ASP or AS. For the value defined the SG is indicating to an ASP(s) in
the AS that another ASP is required in order to handle the load of the AS.
The format and description of the optional Interface Identifiers and
Info String parameters is the same as for the ASP Active message
(See Section 3.3.3.3.)
Morneault, et al [Page 20]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
4.0 Procedures
The M2UA layers needs to respond to various primitives it receives from
other layers as well as messages it receives from the peer-to-peer
messages. This section describes various procedures involved in
response to these events.
4.1 Procedures to Support Service in Section 1.4.1
These procedures achieve the M2UA layer's "Transport of MTP Level 2 /
MTP Level 3 boundary" service.
4.1.1 MTP Level 2 / MTP Level 3 Boundary Procedures
On receiving a primitive from the local upper layer, the M2UA layer will
send the corresponding MAUP message (see Section 2) to its peer. The
M2UA layer must fill in various fields of the common and specific headers
correctly. In addition the message needs to be sent on the SCTP stream
that corresponds to the SS7 link.
4.1.2 MAUP Message Procedures
On receiving MAUP messages from a peer M2UA layer, the M2UA layer on an
SG or MGC needs to invoke the corresponding layer primitives to the
local MTP Level 2 or MTP Level 3 layer.
Morneault, et al [Page 21]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
4.2 Procedures to Support Service in Section 1.4.2
These procedures achieve the M2UA layer's "Support for Communication
between Layer Managements" service.
4.2.1 Layer Management Primitives Procedure
On receiving these primitives from the local layer, the M2UA layer will
send the corresponding MGMT message (Error) to its peer. The M2UA layer
must fill in the various fields of the common and specific headers
correctly.
4.2.2 MGMT message procedures
Upon receipt of MGMT messages the M2UA layer must invoke the corresponding
Layer Management primitives (M-ERROR) to the local layer management.
4.3 Procedures to Support Service in Section 1.4.3
These procedures achieve the M2UA layer's "Support for management of
active associations between SG and MGC" service.
4.3.1 State Maintenance
The M2UA layer on the SG maintains the state of each AS, in each
Appliction Server that it is configured to receive traffic.
4.3.1.1 ASP States
The state of the each ASP, in each AS that it is configured, is
maintained in the IUA layer on the SG. The state of an ASP changes
due to events. The events include
* Reception of messages from peer IUA layer at that ASP
* Reception of some messages from the peer IUA layer at other
ASPs in the AS
* Reception of indications from SCTP layer
* Switch-over Time triggers
The ASP state transition diagram is shown in Figure 4. The possible
states of an ASP are the following:
ASP-DOWN Application Server Process is unavailable and/or the SCTP
association is down. Initially all ASPs will be in this state.
ASP-UP The remote IUA peer at the ASP is available (and the SCTP
association is up) but application traffic is stopped.
ASP-ACTIVE The remote IUA peer at the ASP is available and
application traffic is active.
Figure 4 ASP State Transition Diagram
+-------------+
+----------------------| |
| Alternate +-------| ASP-ACTIVE |<------------+
| ASP | +-------------+ |
| Takeover | ^ | |
| | ASP | | ASP |
| | Active | | Inactive | ASP
| | | v |Takeover
| | +-------------+ |
| | | |-------------+
| +------>| ASP-UP |-------------+
| +-------------+ |
| ^ | |
ASP Down/ | ASP | | ASP Down / | ASP
SCTP CDI | Up | | SCTP CDI | Down/
| | v | SCTP
| +-------------+ | CDI
| | | |
+--------------------->| |<------------+
| ASP-DOWN |
+-------------+
SCTP CDI The local SCTP layer's Communication Down Indication to the
Upper Layer Protocol (IUA) on an SG. The local SCTP will send this
indication when it detects the loss of connectivity to the ASP's peer
SCTP layer.
Ts Switch-over Time Triggers. This timer is configurable by the
Operator on a per AS basis. The default value of this timer should
be three seconds.
Morneault, et al [Page 22]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
4.3.1.2 AS States
The state of the AS is maintained in the IUA layer on the SG.
The state of an AS changes due to events. These events include the
following:
* ASP state transitions
* Recovery timer triggers
The possible states of an AS are the following:
AS-DOWN The Application Server is unavailable. This state implies
that all related ASPs are in the ASP-DOWN state for this AS.
Initially the AS will be in this state.
AS-UP The Application Server is available but no application traffic
is active (i.e., one or more related ASPs are in the ASP-UP state,
but none in the ASP-Active state).
AS-ACTIVE The Application Server is available and application traffic
is active. This state implies that one ASP is in the ASP-ACTIVE state.
AS-PENDING An active ASP has transitioned from active to inactive or
down and it was the last remaining active ASP in the AS. A recovery
timer T(r) will be started and all incoming SCN messages will be
queued by the SG. If an ASP becomes active before T(r) expires, the
AS will move to AS-ACTIVE state and all the queued messages will be
sent to the active ASP.
If T(r) expires before an ASP becomes active, the SG stops queuing
messages and discards all previously queued messages. The AS will move
to AS-UP if at least one ASP is in ASP-UP state, otherwise it will move
to AS-DOWN state.
Figure 5 AS State Transition Diagram
+----------+ one ASP trans ACTIVE +-------------+
| |------------------------>| |
| AS-UP | | AS-ACTIVE |
| | | |
| |< -| |
+----------+ \ / +-------------+
^ | \ Tr Trigger / ^ |
| | \ at least one / | |
| | \ ASP in UP / | |
| | \ / | |
| | \ / | |
| | \ /---/ | |
one ASP | | \ / one ASP | | Last ACTIVE ASP
trans | | all ASP \-/----\ trans to | | trans to UP or
to UP | | trans to / \ ACTIVE | | DOWN
| | DOWN / \ | |
| | / \ | |
| | / \ | |
| | /all ASP \ | |
| v / trans to \ | v
+----------+ / DOWN \ +-------------+
| |<--/ -| |
| AS-DOWN | | AS-PENDING |
| | | (queueing) |
| |<------------------------| |
+----------+ Tr Trigger no ASP +-------------+
in UP state
Tr = Recovery Timer
Morneault, et al [Page 23]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
4.3.2 ASPM procedures for primitives
Before the establishment of an SCTP association the ASP state at both
the SG and ASP is assumed to be "Down".
As the ASP is responsible for initiating the setup of an SCTP
association to an SG, the IUA layer at an ASP receives an M-SCTP
ESTABLISH request primitive from the Layer Management, the IUA layer
will try to establish an SCTP association with the remote IUA peer at
an SG. Upon reception of an eventual SCTP-Communication Up confirm
primitive from the SCTP, the IUA layer will invoke the primitive
M-SCTP ESTABLISH confirm to the Layer Management.
At the SG, the IUA layer will receive an SCTP Communication Up
indication primitive from the SCTP. The IUA layer will then invoke
the primitive M-SCTP ESTABLISH indication to the Layer Management.
Once the SCTP association is establishedand assuming that the local
IUA-User is ready, the local ASP IUA Application Server Process
Maintenance (ASPM) function will initiate the ASPM procedures, using
the ASP-Up/-Down/-Active/-Inactive messages to convey the ASP-state to
the SG - see Section 4.3.3.
The Layer Management and the IUA layer on SG can communicate the
status of the application server using the M-AS STATUS primitives.
The Layer Managements and the IUA layers on both the SG and ASP
can communicate the status of an SCTP association using the
M-SCTP STATUS primitives.
If the Layer Management on SG or ASP wants to bring down an SCTP
association for management reasons, they would send M-SCTP RELEASE
request primitive to the local IUA layer. The IUA layer would release
the SCTP association and upon receiving the SCTP Communication Down
indication from the underlying SCTP layer, it would inform the local
Layer Management using M-SCTP RELEASE confirm primitive.
If the IUA layer receives an SCTP-Communication Down indication
from the underlying SCTP layer, it will inform the Layer
Management by invoking the M-SCTP RELEASE indication primitive. The
state of the ASP will be moved to "Down" at both the SG and ASP.
At an ASP, the Layer Management may try to reestablish the SCTP
association using M-SCTP ESTABLISH request primitive.
4.3.3 ASPM procedures for peer-to-peer messages
All ASPM messages are sent on a sequenced stream to ensure ordering.
SCTP stream �0� is used.
4.3.3.2 ASP-Up
After an ASP has successfully established an SCTP association to an SG,
the SG waits for the ASP to send an ASP-Up message, indicating that the
ASP IUA peer is available. The ASP is always the initiator of the
ASP-Up exchange.
When an ASP-Up message is received at an SG and internally the ASP is
not considered locked-out for local management reasons, the SG marks
the remote ASP as Up. The SG responds with an ASP-Up Ack message in
acknowledgement. The SG sends an-Up Ack message in response to a
received ASP-Up message even if the ASP is already marked as "Up"
at the SG.
If for any local reason the SG cannot respond with an ASP-Up, the SG
responds to a ASP-Up with a Notify (ASP-Down) message.
At the ASP, the ASP-Up Ack message received from the SG is not
acknowledged by the ASP. If the ASP does not receive a response from
the SG, or an ASP-Down is received, the ASP may resend ASP-Up messages
every 2 seconds until it receives a Notify (ASP-Up) message from the
SG. The ASP may decide to reduce the frequency (say to every 5
seconds) if an ASP-Up Ack is not received after a few tries.
The ASP must wait for the ASP-Up Ack message from the SG before
sending any ASP traffic control messages (ASPAC or ASPIA) or Data
messages or it will risk message loss. If the SG receives Data
messages before an ASP Up is received, the SG should discard.
Morneault, et al [Page 24]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
4.3.3.2 ASP-Down
The ASP will send an ASP-Down to an SG when the ASP is to be removed
from the list of ASPs in all Application Servers that it is a member.
The SG marks the ASP as "Down" and returns an ASP-Down Ack message to
the ASP if one of the following events occur:
- an ASP-Down message is received from the ASP,
- another ASPM message is received from the ASP and the SG has
locked out the ASP for management reasons.
The SG sends anASP-Down Ack message in response to a received ASP-Down
message from the ASP even if the ASP is already marked as "Down" at
the SG.
If the ASP does not receive a response from the SG, the ASP may send
ASP-Down messages every 2 seconds until it receives an ASP-Down Ack
message from the SG or the SCTP association goes down. The ASP may
decide to reduce the frequency (say to every 5 seconds) if an ASP-Down
Ack is not received after a few tries.
4.3.3.3 M2UA Version Control
If a ASP-Up message with an unsupported version is received, the
receiving end responds with an Error message, indicating the version the
receiving node supports.
This is useful when protocol version upgrades are being performed in a
network. A node upgraded to a newer version should support the older
versions used on other nodes it is communicating with. Because ASPs
initiate the ASP-Up procedure it is assumed that the Error message would
normally come from the SG.
4.3.3.4 ASP-Active
Any time after the ASP has received a ASP-Up Ack from the SG, the ASP
sends an ASP-Active (ASPAC) to the SG indicating that the ASP is ready
to start processing traffic. In the case where an ASP is configured/-
registered to process the traffic for more than one Application Server
across an SCTP association, the ASPAC contains one or more Interface
Identifiers to indicate for which Application Servers the ASPAC applies.
When an ASP Active (ASPAC) message is received, the SG responds to the
ASP with a ASPAC Ack message acknowledging that the ASPAC was received
and starts sending traffic for the associated Application Server(s)
to that ASP.
Morneault, et al [Page 25]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
There are two modes of Application Server traffic handling in the SG
IUA - Over-ride and Load-balancing. The Type parameter in the ASPAC
messge indicates the mode used in a particular Application Server. If
the SG determines that the mode indicates in an ASPAC is incompatible
with the traffic handling mode currently used in the AS, the SG responds
with an Error message indicating Invalid Traffic Handling Mode.
In the case of an Over-ride mode AS, reception of an ASPAC message at
an SG causes the redirection of all traffic for the AS to the ASP that
sent the ASPAC. The SG responds to the ASPAC with an ASP-Active Ack
message to the ASP. Any previously active ASP in the AS is now
considered Inactive and will no longer receive traffic from the SG
within the AS. The SG sends a Notify (Alternate ASP-Active) to the
previously active ASP in the AS, after stopping all traffic to that
ASP.
In the case of a load-share mode AS, reception of an ASPAC message at
an SG causes the direction of traffic to the ASP sending the ASPAC,
in addition to all the other ASPs that are currently active in the AS.
The algorithm at the SG for loadsharing traffic within an AS to all
the active ASPs is application and network dependent. The algorithm
could, for example be round-robin or based on information in the Data
message, such as Interface ID, depending on the requirements of the
application and the call state handling assumptions of the collection
of ASPs in the AS. The SG responds to the ASPAC with a ASP-Active Ack
message to the ASP.
4.3.3.5 ASP Inactive
When an ASP wishes to withdraw from receiving traffic within an AS,
the ASP sends an ASP Inactive (ASPIA) to the SG. In the case where
an ASP is configured/registered to process the traffic for more than
one Application Server across an SCTP association, the ASPIA contains
one or more Interface Ids to indicate for which Application Servers
the ASPIA applies.
There are two modes of Application Server traffic handling in the SG
IUA when withdrawing an ASP from service - Over-ride and Load-balancing.
The Type parameter in the ASPIA messge indicates the mode used in a
particular Application Server. If the SG determines that the mode
indicates in an ASPAC is incompatible with the traffic handling mode
currently used in the AS, the SG responds with an Error message
indicating Invalid Traffic Handling Mode.
In the case of an Over-ride mode AS, where normally another ASP has
already taken over the traffic within the AS with an Over-ride ASPAC,
the ASP which sends the ASPIA is already considered by the SG to be
"Inactive" (i.e., in the "Up" state). An ASPIA Ack message is sent
to the ASP, after ensuring that all traffic is stopped to the ASP.
In the case of a Loadshare mode AS, the SG moves the ASP to the "Up"
state and the AS traffic is re-allocated across the remaining
"active" ASPs per the load-sharing algorithm currently used within
the AS. AnASPIA Ack message is sent to the ASP after all traffic
is halted to the ASP.
If no other ASPs are Active in the Application Server, the SG either
discards all incoming messages for the AS or starts buffering the
incoming messages for T(r)seconds, after which messages will be
discarded. T(r) is configurable by the network operator. If the SG
receives an ASPAC from an ASP in the AS before expiry of T(r), the
buffered traffic is directed to the ASP and the timer is cancelled.
Morneault, et al [Page 26]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
4.3.3.5 Notify
In the case where a Notify (AS-Up) message is sent by an SG that now
has no ASPs active to service the traffic, the Notify does not force
the ASP(s) receiving the message to become active. The ASPs remain in
control of what (and when) action is taken.
4.3.3.6 Heartbeat
The optional Heartbeat procedures may be used when operating over
transport layers that do not have their own heartbeat mechanism for
detecting loss of the transport association (i.e., other than the
SCTP).
Once the ASP sends an ASP-Up message to the SG, the ASP sends Beat
messages periodically, subject to a provisionable timer T(beat).
The SG M3UA, upon receiving a BEAT message from the ASP, responds
with a BEAT message. If no BEAT message (or any other M3UA message),
is received from the ASP within the timer 2*T(beat), the ASP will
consider the remote M3UA as 'Down".
At the ASP, if no BEAT message (or any other M3UA message) is
received from the SG within 2*T(beat), the SG is considered
unavailable. Transmission of BEAT messages is stopped and ASP-Up
procedures are used to re-establish communication with the SG M3UA
peer.
Note: Heartbeat related events are not shown in Figure 4 "ASP state
transition diagram".
5.0 Examples of MTP2 User Adaptation (M2UA) Procedures
5.1 Establishment of associations between SG and MGC examples
5.1.1 Single ASP in an Application Server (�1+0� sparing)
This scenario shows the example M2UA message flows for the establishment
of traffic between an SG and an ASP, where only one ASP is configured
within an AS (no backup). It is assumed that the SCTP association is
already set-up.
SG ASP1
|
|<---------ASP Up----------|
|--------ASP-Up Ack------->|
| |
|<-------ASP Active--------|
|------ASP_Active Ack----->|
| |
5.1.2 Two ASPs in Application Server (�1+1� sparing)
This scenario shows the example M2UA message flows for the establishment
of traffic between an SG and two ASPs in the same Application Server,
where ASP1 is configured to be �active� and ASP2 a �standby� in the event
of communication failure or the withdrawal from service of ASP1. ASP2 may
act as a hot, warm, or cold standby depending on the extent to which ASP1
and ASP2 share call/transaction state or can communicate call state under
failure/withdrawal events. The example message flow is the same whether
the ASP-Active messages are Over-ride or Load-share mode although typically
this example would use an Over-ride mode.
SG ASP1 ASP2
| | |
|<--------ASP Up----------| |
|-------ASP-Up Ack------->| |
| | |
|<-----------------------------ASP Up----------------|
|----------------------------ASP-Up Ack------------->|
| | |
| | |
|<-------ASP Active-------| |
|-----ASP-Active Ack----->| |
| | |
Morneault, et al [Page 27]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
5.1.3 Two ASPs in an Application Server (�1+1� sparing, load-sharing case)
This scenario shows a similar case to Section 5.1.2 but where the two
ASPs are brought to �active� and loadshare the traffic load. In this
case, one ASP is sufficient to handle the total traffic load.
SG ASP1 ASP2
| | |
|<---------ASP Up---------| |
|---------ASP-UpAck------>| |
| | |
|<------------------------------ASP Up---------------|
|-----------------------------ASP Up Ack------------>|
| | |
| | |
|<--ASP Active (Ldshr)----| |
|----ASP-Active Ack------>| |
| | |
|<----------------------------ASP Active (Ldshr)-----|
|-----------------------------ASP-Active Ack-------->|
| | |
5.1.4 Three ASPs in an Application Server (�n+k� sparing, load-sharing case)
This scenario shows the example M2UA message flows for the establishment
of traffic between an SG and three ASPs in the same Application Server,
where two of the ASPs are brought to �active� and share the load. In
this case, a minimum of two ASPs are required to handle the total traffic
load (2+1 sparing).
SG ASP1 ASP2 ASP3
| | | |
|<------ASP Up-------| | |
|-----ASP-Up Ack---->| | |
| | | |
|<--------------------------ASP Up-------| |
|------------------------ASP-U Ack)----->| |
| | | |
|<---------------------------------------------ASP Up--------|
|-------------------------------------------ASPASP-Up Ack--->|
| | | |
| | | |
|<-ASP Act (Ldshr)---| | |
|----ASP-Act Ack---->| | |
| | | |
|<--------------------ASP Act. (Ldshr)---| |
|----------------------ASP-Act Ack------>| |
| | | |
Morneault, et al [Page 28]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
5.2 ASP Traffic Fail-over Examples
5.2.1 (1+1 Sparing, withdrawal of ASP, Back-up Over-ride)
Following on from the example in Section 5.1.2, and ASP withdraws from
service:
SG ASP1 ASP2
| | |
|<-----ASP Inactive-------| |
|----ASP Inactive Ack---->| |
|--------------------NTFY(AS-Down) (Optional)------->|
| | |
|<------------------------------ ASP Active----------|
|-----------------------------ASP-Active Ack)------->|
| |
Note: If the SG detects loss of the M2UA peer (M2UA heartbeat loss or
detection of SCTP failure), the initial SG-ASP1 ASP Inactive message
exchange would not occur.
5.2.2 (1+1 Sparing, Back-up Over-ride)
Following on from the example in Section 5.1.2, and ASP2 wishes to over-
ride ASP1 and take over the traffic:
SG ASP1 ASP2
| | |
|<------------------------------ ASP Active----------|
|-----------------------------ASP-Active Ack-------->|
|----NTFY( Alt ASP-Act)-->|
| | |
5.2.3 (n+k Sparing, Load-sharing case, withdrawal of ASP)
Following on from the example in Section 5.1.4, and ASP1 withdraws from
service:
SG ASP1 ASP2 ASP3
| | | |
|<----ASP Inact.-----| | |
|---ASP-Inact Ack--->| | |
| | | |
|---------------------------------NTFY(Ins. ASPs)(Optional)->|
| | | |
|<-----------------------------------------ASP Act (Ldshr)---|
|-------------------------------------------ASP Act (Ack)--->|
| | | |
The Notify message to ASP3 is optional, as well as the ASP-Active from
ASP3. The optional Notify can only occur if the SG maintains knowledge
of the minimum ASP resources required - for example if the SG knows that
�n+k� = �2+1� for a loadshare AS and �n� currently equals �1�.
Note: If the SG detects loss of the ASP1 M2UA peer (M2UA heartbeat loss
or detection of SCTP failure), the first SG-ASP1 ASP Inactive message
exchange would not occur.
Morneault, et al [Page 29]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
5.3 SG to MGC, MTP Level 2 to MTP Level 3 Boundary Procedures
5.3.1 SS7 Link Alignment
The MGC can request that a SS7 link be brought into alignment using the
normal or emergency procedure. An example of the message flow to bring
a SS7 link in-service using the normal alignment procedure is shown
below.
SG ASP
| |
|<---------Establish Req--------------|
| |
|----------Establish Cfm------------->|
| |
An example of the message flow to bring a SS7 link in-service using the
emergency alignment procedure.
SG ASP
| |
|<----State Req (STATUS_EMER_SET)-----|
| |
|-----State Cfm (STATUS_EMER_SET)---->|
| |
|<---------Establish Req--------------|
| |
|----------Establish Cfm------------->|
| |
Morneault, et al [Page 24]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
5.3.2 SS7 Link Release
The MGC can request that a SS7 link be taken out-of-service. It uses
the Release Request message as shown below.
SG ASP
| |
|<-----Release Req (RELEASE_MGMT)-----|
| |
|------------Release Cfm------------->|
| |
The SG can autonomously indicate that a SS7 link has gone out-of-service
as shown below.
SG ASP
| |
|------Release Ind (RELEASE_PHYS)---->|
| |
5.3.3 Set and Clear Local Processor Outage
The MGC can set a Local Processor Outage condition. It uses the
State Request message as shown below.
SG ASP
| |
|<-----State Req (STATUS_LPO_SET)-----|
| |
|------State Cfm (STATUS_LPO_SET)---->|
| |
The MGC can clear a Local Processor Outage condition. It uses the
State Request message as shown below.
SG ASP
| |
|<----State Req (STATUS_LPO_CLEAR)----|
| |
|-----State Cfm (STATUS_LPO_CLEAR)--->|
| |
5.3.4 Notification of Processor Outage (local or remote)
The SG can indicate a Local or Remote Processor Outage condition. It
uses the State Indication message as shown below.
SG ASP
| |
|-----State Ind (EVENT_ENTER_LPO)---->|
| |
|-----State Ind (EVENT_EXIT_LPO)----->|
| |
SG ASP
| |
|-----State Ind (EVENT_ENTER_RPO)---->|
| |
|-----State Ind (EVENT_EXIT_RPO)----->|
| |
Morneault, et al [Page 30]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
5.3.5 SS7 Link Changeover
An example of the message flow for a changeover is shown below. In this
example, there were three messages in the retransmission queue that
needed to be retrieved.
SG ASP
| |
|<---Retrieval Req (MTP2_RTRV_BSN)----|
| |
|------Retrieval Cfm (with BSN)------>|
| |
|<--Retrieval Req (MTP2_RTRV_MSGS)----|
| with FSN |
| |
|-----------Retrieval Cfm------------>|
| |
|-----------Retrieval Ind------------>|
|-----------Retrieval Ind------------>|
|-------Retrieval Complete Ind------->|
| |
Note: The number of Retrieval Indication is dependent on the number of
messages in the retransmit queue that have been requested. Only one
Retrieval Complete Indication should be sent.
6.0 Security
6.1 Introduction
M2UA is designed to carry signaling messages for telephony services. As such,
M2UA must involve the security needs of several parties: the end users
of the services; the network providers and the applications involved.
Additional requirements may come from local regulation. While having some
overlapping security needs, any security solution should fulfill all of the
different parties' needs.
6.2 Threats
There is no quick fix, one-size-fits-all solution for security. As a
transport protocol, M2UA has the following security objectives:
* Availability of reliable and timely user data transport.
* Integrity of user data transport.
* Confidentiality of user data.
M2UA runs on top of SCTP. SCTP [6] provides certain transport related
security features, such as:
* Blind Denial of Service Attacks
* Flooding
* Masquerade
* Improper Monopolization of Services
When M2UA is running in professionally managed corporate or service
provider network, it is reasonable to expect that this network includes
an appropriate security policy framework. The "Site Security Handbook" [9]
should be consulted for guidance.
Morneault, et al [Page 31]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
When the network in which M2UA runs in involves more than one party, it
may not be reasonable to expect that all parties have implemented security
in a sufficient manner. In such a case, it is recommended that IPSEC is
used to ensure confidentiality of user payload. Consult [10] for more
information on configuring IPSEC services.
6.3 Protecting Confidentiality
Particularly for mobile users, the requirement for confidentiality may
include the masking of IP addresses and ports. In this case application
level encryption is not sufficient; IPSEC ESP should be used instead.
Regardless of which level performs the encryption, the IPSEC ISAKMP
service should be used for key management.
7.0 IANA Considerations
A request will be made to IANA to assign an M2UA value for the Payload
Protocol Identifier in SCTP Payload Data chunk. The following SCTP Payload
Protocol Identifier will be registered:
M2UA tbd
The SCTP Payload Protocol Identifier is included in each SCTP Data chunk,
to indicate which protocol the SCTP is carrying. This Payload Protocol
Identifier is not directly used by SCTP but may be used by certain network
entities to identify the type of information being carried in a Data chunk.
The User Adaptation peer may use the Payload Protocol Identifier as a way
of determining additional information about the data being presented to it
by SCTP.
8.0 Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ian Rytina, Hanns Juergen Schwarzbauer
and ZhangYi for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Morneault, et al [Page 32]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
9.0 References
[1] ITU-T Recommendation Q.700, 'Introduction To ITU-T Signalling
System No. 7 (SS7)'
[2] ITU-T Recommendation Q.701-Q.705, 'Signalling System No. 7 (SS7) -
Message Transfer Part (MTP)'
[3] ANSI T1.111 'Signalling System Number 7 - Message Transfer Part'
[4] Bellcore GR-246-CORE 'Bell Communications Research Specification
of Signaling System Number 7', Volume 1, December 1995
[5] Framework Architecture for Signaling Transport, draft-ietf-sigtran-
framework-arch-03.txt, June 1999
[6] Simple Control Transmission Protocol, draft-ietf-sigtran-sctp-07.txt,
March 2000
[7] Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP), draft-huitema-megaco-mgcp-
v1-03.txt, August 1999
[8] ITU-T Recommendation Q.2210, 'Message transfer part level 3
functions and messages using the services of ITU-T
Recommendation Q.2140'
[9] RFC 2196, "Site Security Handbook", B. Fraser Ed., September 1997
[10] RFC 2401, "Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol", S.
Kent, R. Atkinson, November 1998.
Morneault, et al [Page 33]
Internet Draft SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation Layer Jul 2000
10.0 Author's Addresses
Ken Morneault Tel: +1-703-484-3323
Cisco Systems Inc. EMail: [email protected]
13615 Dulles Technology Drive
Herndon, VA. 20171
USA
Malleswar Kalla Tel: +1-973-829-5212
Telcordia Technologies EMail: [email protected]
MCC 1J211R
445 South Street
Morristown, NJ 07960
USA
Greg Sidebottom Tel: +1-613-763-7305
Nortel Networks EMail: [email protected]
3685 Richmond Rd,
Nepean, Ontario
Canada K2H5B7
Ram Dantu, Ph.D. Tel +1-972-234-6070 extension 211
IPmobile EMail [email protected]
1651 North Glenville, Suite 216
Richardson, TX 75081
USA
Tom George Tel: +1-972-519-3168
Alcatel USA EMail: [email protected]
1000 Coit Road
Plano, TX 74075
USA
This Internet Draft expires December 2000.
| ||||||||||||||||
| Last modified: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:20:05 GMT Copyright © 2014 OpenSS7 Corporation All Rights Reserved. | |||||||||||||||||